Forest Invasion

Huge swathe of Dodowa Forest cleared to relocate traders, raising alarm among environmentalists

The Fourth Estate’s Forest Invasion story Named Third-Best Investigative Report in Africa

The Fourth Estate’s exposé on mining in forest reserves shortlisted for African Investigative Journalist of the Year Awards

The Fourth Estate Journalists honoured for galamsey exposé

PHOTOS: When did asking for clean water become a crime? – Ghanaian youth rise against Illegal mining

Rejoinder: Ministry of Lands refutes allegations against minister

Forest Invasion: Minerals Commission deletes critical information about mining companies after The Fourth Estate revelations

Forest invasion: Land Minister’s half-truth to Parliament & the contradictions fueling mining in Ghana’s forest reserves

Latest Podcast

Mathematical Mix-up or Deliberate Duplication? Why the Presidency’s Big Push report doesn’t add up

The Fourth Estate’s investigations into the Mahama administration’s flagship construction project, The Big Push, generated a lot of public debate about the use and abuse of sole source procurement in the award of public contracts. In May 2026, in response to The Fourth Estate’s investigation, the presidency released a 72-page report which concluded that the Ministry of Roads and Highways did not abuse the sole source process in its award of contracts under the Big Push initiative. Interestingly, the number of Big Push contracts used to arrive at that conclusion differed from those obtained by The Fourth Estate through a Right to Information (RTI) request from the Roads Ministry. While the presidency’s response sought to dispute the number of sole-sourced contracts awarded under the initiative, it however, did not dispute the cost per project contained in The Fourth Estate’s report. So what did the presidency miss in its own review of contracts awarded under its flagship project? Kwaku Krobea Asante joins us to break down the figures and point out where they fall short.