Asset declaration in Ghana

MPs rush to declare assets after The Fourth Estate exposé

Asset declaration: The Supreme Court lords who disregarded the law

Asset declaration: Full list of appointees who complied with Mahama’s May 7 deadline and those who didn’t after The Fourth Estate’s investigations

294 political appointees rush to declare assets following The Fourth Estate’s exposé

Mahama’s 11 ministers who never declared their assets

“Don’t send me such foolish message again!” K.T Hammond responds to asset declaration status

Asset Declaration: Bawumia, Ofori-Atta, Osafo-Maafo, Kyei-Mensah-Bonsu, and 89 others did not fully comply

Akufo-Addo’s First & Second Term: 27 ministers who didn’t declare assets at all

Exclusive: Akufo-Addo’s 18 ministers who never declared their assets

Latest Podcast

Mathematical Mix-up or Deliberate Duplication? Why the Presidency’s Big Push report doesn’t add up

The Fourth Estate’s investigations into the Mahama administration’s flagship construction project, The Big Push, generated a lot of public debate about the use and abuse of sole source procurement in the award of public contracts. In May 2026, in response to The Fourth Estate’s investigation, the presidency released a 72-page report which concluded that the Ministry of Roads and Highways did not abuse the sole source process in its award of contracts under the Big Push initiative. Interestingly, the number of Big Push contracts used to arrive at that conclusion differed from those obtained by The Fourth Estate through a Right to Information (RTI) request from the Roads Ministry. While the presidency’s response sought to dispute the number of sole-sourced contracts awarded under the initiative, it however, did not dispute the cost per project contained in The Fourth Estate’s report. So what did the presidency miss in its own review of contracts awarded under its flagship project? Kwaku Krobea Asante joins us to break down the figures and point out where they fall short.